Eureka Youth
Sunday, 17 April 2011
Sunday, 3 April 2011
AUSTRALIAN STUDENTS UNITE!
There have been Nationalist student activities for three decades, but these efforts have been only pinpricks; however, as Australian Nationalism develops in the general community as a popular movement, the time has certainly arrived for a major campus push by our existing militants and by the new forces which will be mobilised.
The hour is late for Australia. The University is an important area for political struggle. We are urged on by our faith that the Australian Identity will not be extinguished on this Continent, that political and economic independence can be won for Australia, that a “Southern Nation” (Henry Lawson) will arise.
It is time for Nationalist students to acquire direction and begin to plan for the campus fight – soon to begin.
CAPITALISM, OPINION-MAKING AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION
The University is not simply a place where students ‘learn,’ get a degree and are thus prepared for the workforce.
The University is a centre of power inside our economic-political-cultural order.
As a power centre for the Australian State, the University has a specialised function: its aim is to produce graduates who are able to “serve” as willing links in the economic and political organisations of this society, who have the ‘correct’ political opinions and who have personal-cultural values which can be imparted to others: i.e., liberal, globalist, values. If we strip away the mask of our ‘free’ University, we can see it as an instrument for social control.
Just as the ‘principle’ of Australian liberal capitalism for the general community is: CONFORM, CONSUME, OBEY, so this ‘principle’ is also enforced upon the intelligentsia of our society, albeit with one variation: the system makes the promise’ of financial reward and occasionally – public recognition.
The link between the University and capitalism is demonstrable. Business and government fund various specialised ‘think tanks’; academics have their ‘findings’ published as epistles in the media; courses and specialised programs (and scholarships) interlink the University with local and international business needs. Detailed research needs to be done to document these open and subtle links such that an effective propaganda can develop. For example, research into the new American institute at Sydney University would demonstrate the point. A University administration seeks to create an atmosphere of academic achievement, of ‘normalcy’ in its operation, to convince the student that it is a ‘wise’ machine dedicated to the common good; if its intellectual bases are at no point ‘contested,’ the process of ‘adapting’ the student to its programs goes without opposition.
Essentially, the University governs the mind through establishing correct ‘opinions’ in the course material. Economics courses ‘discuss’ globalisation, economic rationalism, international banking and the multinational as if we did not live in an epoch where fractious nationalisms are refusing to yield to a global village. Politics teaches that liberal democracy has emerged the victor of twentieth century ideological debates, that globalisation is inevitable, and that Australia is a ‘part of Asia’; indeed, ‘Australia’ itself is a political lie given that Australia was ‘stolen’ in the first instance by Europeans who have since accepted their guilt in the most submissive and humiliating manner. New courses in ‘Asian Studies’ replace our own cultural heritage, and Language Schools have been more richly endowed to teach us the tongues of our new partners in capitalist ‘rationality’ rather than the languages and texts in which our own traditions are written. Studies in anthropology teach the ‘out of Africa’ mythos of human origins, a partial truth that establishes (sic) the globalist myth of human sameness.
Of course, free debate may occur in a University; we may debate philosophy or theology or aspects of any subject material, but we would fool ourselves if we took the illusion of ‘freedom’ for its substance. Whatever we may ‘think,’ the course material will remain the same. And students, like academics must be careful. Too much freedom will draw censure – as in the case of Professor Andrew Fraser of Macquarie University who found himself out of a job for his linking of race and intelligence, of ethnicity and crime.
The University establishes its political clubs, its campus societies, its academic rules (no sexism, ageism, racism, ‘bias’ in the language of academic ‘Papers’ or otherwise) to enforce conformity. Debate is to occur within particular parameters although a few Left sects may be ‘permitted’ to operate as a sign of University tolerance. Yet, the Left does not essentially challenge globalism, only prattles about who should benefit from it.
Nationalism, naturally, is anathema to such a system.
No more and no less than a University in an authoritarian state, is the Australian University a machine for the silent psychic terrorisation of the student.
It was Antonio Gramsci who explained the importance of the dominant class of a society establishing the HEGEMONY of its ideological basis over other social sectors and rival ideologies. Hegemony implies the de-legitimisation of other views and an effort to force such views onto a plane where all are compelled to adopt the language/style of the dominant ideology. The subtlety of such an approach does not belie its coercive nature; to ‘unlearn’ the brainwash can be as difficult in our ‘free’ society, as it would be for a student in formerly Stalinist countries. When control is not ‘obvious,’ its existence can be denied. Critics such as ourselves can be denounced as heretics, just as European scholarship was once greeted as a violation of religious teaching.
The Nationalist student is soldiering in a political wasteland whose national achievement can only be the destruction and despoiling of Australia. It is a situation which would cause the strongest of us to ponder whether we can overcome the power arrayed against us. Nonetheless, the recognition of what we are fighting is the first necessary step.
Nationalist Student Activism: New Perspectives On
Ideas, Strategy and Tactics For A New Movement
B. Knight.
The hour is late for Australia. The University is an important area for political struggle. We are urged on by our faith that the Australian Identity will not be extinguished on this Continent, that political and economic independence can be won for Australia, that a “Southern Nation” (Henry Lawson) will arise.
It is time for Nationalist students to acquire direction and begin to plan for the campus fight – soon to begin.
CAPITALISM, OPINION-MAKING AND CULTURAL INTEGRATION
The University is not simply a place where students ‘learn,’ get a degree and are thus prepared for the workforce.
The University is a centre of power inside our economic-political-cultural order.
As a power centre for the Australian State, the University has a specialised function: its aim is to produce graduates who are able to “serve” as willing links in the economic and political organisations of this society, who have the ‘correct’ political opinions and who have personal-cultural values which can be imparted to others: i.e., liberal, globalist, values. If we strip away the mask of our ‘free’ University, we can see it as an instrument for social control.
Just as the ‘principle’ of Australian liberal capitalism for the general community is: CONFORM, CONSUME, OBEY, so this ‘principle’ is also enforced upon the intelligentsia of our society, albeit with one variation: the system makes the promise’ of financial reward and occasionally – public recognition.
The link between the University and capitalism is demonstrable. Business and government fund various specialised ‘think tanks’; academics have their ‘findings’ published as epistles in the media; courses and specialised programs (and scholarships) interlink the University with local and international business needs. Detailed research needs to be done to document these open and subtle links such that an effective propaganda can develop. For example, research into the new American institute at Sydney University would demonstrate the point. A University administration seeks to create an atmosphere of academic achievement, of ‘normalcy’ in its operation, to convince the student that it is a ‘wise’ machine dedicated to the common good; if its intellectual bases are at no point ‘contested,’ the process of ‘adapting’ the student to its programs goes without opposition.
Essentially, the University governs the mind through establishing correct ‘opinions’ in the course material. Economics courses ‘discuss’ globalisation, economic rationalism, international banking and the multinational as if we did not live in an epoch where fractious nationalisms are refusing to yield to a global village. Politics teaches that liberal democracy has emerged the victor of twentieth century ideological debates, that globalisation is inevitable, and that Australia is a ‘part of Asia’; indeed, ‘Australia’ itself is a political lie given that Australia was ‘stolen’ in the first instance by Europeans who have since accepted their guilt in the most submissive and humiliating manner. New courses in ‘Asian Studies’ replace our own cultural heritage, and Language Schools have been more richly endowed to teach us the tongues of our new partners in capitalist ‘rationality’ rather than the languages and texts in which our own traditions are written. Studies in anthropology teach the ‘out of Africa’ mythos of human origins, a partial truth that establishes (sic) the globalist myth of human sameness.
Of course, free debate may occur in a University; we may debate philosophy or theology or aspects of any subject material, but we would fool ourselves if we took the illusion of ‘freedom’ for its substance. Whatever we may ‘think,’ the course material will remain the same. And students, like academics must be careful. Too much freedom will draw censure – as in the case of Professor Andrew Fraser of Macquarie University who found himself out of a job for his linking of race and intelligence, of ethnicity and crime.
The University establishes its political clubs, its campus societies, its academic rules (no sexism, ageism, racism, ‘bias’ in the language of academic ‘Papers’ or otherwise) to enforce conformity. Debate is to occur within particular parameters although a few Left sects may be ‘permitted’ to operate as a sign of University tolerance. Yet, the Left does not essentially challenge globalism, only prattles about who should benefit from it.
Nationalism, naturally, is anathema to such a system.
No more and no less than a University in an authoritarian state, is the Australian University a machine for the silent psychic terrorisation of the student.
It was Antonio Gramsci who explained the importance of the dominant class of a society establishing the HEGEMONY of its ideological basis over other social sectors and rival ideologies. Hegemony implies the de-legitimisation of other views and an effort to force such views onto a plane where all are compelled to adopt the language/style of the dominant ideology. The subtlety of such an approach does not belie its coercive nature; to ‘unlearn’ the brainwash can be as difficult in our ‘free’ society, as it would be for a student in formerly Stalinist countries. When control is not ‘obvious,’ its existence can be denied. Critics such as ourselves can be denounced as heretics, just as European scholarship was once greeted as a violation of religious teaching.
The Nationalist student is soldiering in a political wasteland whose national achievement can only be the destruction and despoiling of Australia. It is a situation which would cause the strongest of us to ponder whether we can overcome the power arrayed against us. Nonetheless, the recognition of what we are fighting is the first necessary step.
Nationalist Student Activism: New Perspectives On
Ideas, Strategy and Tactics For A New Movement
B. Knight.
WW1 What Happened? Empty minds don't think!
Don't let their sacrifice for a free and democratic Australia be in vain. Question what you are taught!
War is Peace! Ignorance is Strength! Freedom is Slavery! All hail the Education system!
Tuesday, 29 March 2011
Programme of the Eureka Youth League
Programme
1. The expense of all Australian tertiary education must be borne by the whole community, as Australian youth are the future of the nation.
2. All debts incurred under higher education contributions – shall be wiped off.
3. Overseas student programs at every level of Australian education should be substantively – phased out. Australian educational institutions for Australians!
4. The teaching of anti Australian multiculturalist propaganda, particularly in schools, will be the subject of counter attack with our Australianist truth and through counter education efforts.
5. The scourge of drugs must be broken and the death penalty imposed on the drug criminals. Any constructive public policy that decreases the level of drug use and addiction must be supported, but only the application of direct control (parental, legal, community) over the addicts themselves, can restore them to a healthy life.
6. Australian jobs are for Australian workers and youth must have the advantages of training and employment. Work on Australia’s farms and businesses should be scheduled and organized to provide support for our university and high school students.
7. Australian social security benefits shall not be denied to Australian youth through nanny state monitoring, but Australian youth are not welfare-dependent children; we should learn the ethos of self-reliance in all things.
8. Australian families must be supported in every way to provide a safe, secure and instructive environment for all young Australians.
9. Pop video culture and the other trash culture and sexualized rubbish derived of globalism shall be energetically denounced as corrosive of the national spirit and offensive to Australian youth, it aspirations, its morals and its future.
10. Australian culture is something experienced as much as learned. Travelling Australia, learning its history and universal training in arms for all youth, both males and females, are parts of that process and any program or partial activity of the current state and society that permits any of that - shall be supported and utilized.
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
THE ROLE OF AN AUSTRALIANIST YOUTH MOVEMENT.
The Eureka Youth League is the vanguard movement for the ideological, political and organisational leadership of Australian Youth.
A key feature of this concept of a 'vanguard' movement consists of committed Activist Members stepping forward to organise, lead, and serve Australian Youth in the struggle to reclaim the resources of Australia as their inheritance, and to ensure identity, freedom and independence, in the face of dispossession and enslavement inherent in the globalist agenda of Big Business.
Activist work is carried out in a way that steadily develops the political consciousness of youth, and an empowerment to understand the whole of society, and ultimately to replace the political traitor class rulers of the system.
To provide the necessary leadership for this to happen, it follows that members must study and really grasp the essence of Australianist ideology and philosophy. It is not enough just to be 'progressive' or even 'militant' without a depth of understanding of Australianist political theory. Depth does not mean theoretical understanding alone, although basic familiarity is essential. It means being able to interpret events from an Australianist standpoint, being able to apply this method of analysis to all sorts of struggles, situations and people. It means finding ways to advance the political awareness of youth. It means finding ways to mobilise youth into activities and actions where they can learn from their own experience the real nature of the struggle.
Knowledge must be connected to practice and this demands study and understanding of the existing conditions. It means every comrade is an active contributor, taking responsibility and being accountable to the collective. Some may have the time, capacity and opportunity to contribute more than others, but all play their part in advancing the Movement Program. In this vanguard movement there are no distinctions between Australian Youth
STYLE OF POLITICAL WORK.
Another key feature of our vanguard movement is the way in which it conducts its political work amongst Australian Youth. The starting point must always be investigation, both academic and practical. In other words, listen, seek the facts - don't just charge in with preconceived ideas.
After investigation, seek out the strengths and weaknesses of the forces involved. Sort out the tactics of struggle most likely to involve the mass of youth or people in struggle, and work to win support for this. At all times, promote unity around the main demands, be where the struggle is hardest, and encourage natural leaders from the ranks.
In the aftermath of struggle, whether successful or not, be there to assist in summing up and drawing out the main lessons from the experience. In this way, comrades can move the level of political consciousness to a higher level. This is the 'mass line' method of political work.
DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM.
Democratic centralism is also a key feature of our vanguard movement. It is characterised by a high level of self discipline based on an understanding that the role is to advance the well being of Australian youth, and to recognise the importance of the collective, not to seek personal gains. This is fully in accord with our Australian Socialist tradition of co-operative organisation for the common good.
Decision-making is carried out through systems of democratic consultation and democratic voting. Once a decision has been made, there is an obligation on all members to carry it out. Dissenting minority views can be reserved and re-presented on a future occasion, but in the meantime, all members are expected to unite and work to implement democratically agreed decisions.
FORCES OF THE STATE.
Another key feature is the attitude to the forces of the state apparatus. While making use of the limited scope of 'legal democratic rights' to agitate, distribute material, conduct meetings and so on, a vanguard movement also takes into account the surveillance and disruption instigated by the paid agents of the state apparatus. It should never be forgotten that many millions of dollars are pumped into spreading rumours, intercepting mail, telephone, email communications, tracking comrades, friends and acquaintances, to say nothing of outright spying, infiltrating agents and poisoning relationships, as well as blatant bribery and intimidation. Rules for conduct with State Agencies are documented in Youth Series No. 2.
An Australianist vanguard movement guards its members, supporters and mass connections as much as possible. It does not conduct all its business in public scrutiny, understanding that the ruling traitor class is not overt to fascist style repression in defence of its wealth, power and domination of society.
A key feature of this concept of a 'vanguard' movement consists of committed Activist Members stepping forward to organise, lead, and serve Australian Youth in the struggle to reclaim the resources of Australia as their inheritance, and to ensure identity, freedom and independence, in the face of dispossession and enslavement inherent in the globalist agenda of Big Business.
Activist work is carried out in a way that steadily develops the political consciousness of youth, and an empowerment to understand the whole of society, and ultimately to replace the political traitor class rulers of the system.
To provide the necessary leadership for this to happen, it follows that members must study and really grasp the essence of Australianist ideology and philosophy. It is not enough just to be 'progressive' or even 'militant' without a depth of understanding of Australianist political theory. Depth does not mean theoretical understanding alone, although basic familiarity is essential. It means being able to interpret events from an Australianist standpoint, being able to apply this method of analysis to all sorts of struggles, situations and people. It means finding ways to advance the political awareness of youth. It means finding ways to mobilise youth into activities and actions where they can learn from their own experience the real nature of the struggle.
Knowledge must be connected to practice and this demands study and understanding of the existing conditions. It means every comrade is an active contributor, taking responsibility and being accountable to the collective. Some may have the time, capacity and opportunity to contribute more than others, but all play their part in advancing the Movement Program. In this vanguard movement there are no distinctions between Australian Youth
STYLE OF POLITICAL WORK.
Another key feature of our vanguard movement is the way in which it conducts its political work amongst Australian Youth. The starting point must always be investigation, both academic and practical. In other words, listen, seek the facts - don't just charge in with preconceived ideas.
After investigation, seek out the strengths and weaknesses of the forces involved. Sort out the tactics of struggle most likely to involve the mass of youth or people in struggle, and work to win support for this. At all times, promote unity around the main demands, be where the struggle is hardest, and encourage natural leaders from the ranks.
In the aftermath of struggle, whether successful or not, be there to assist in summing up and drawing out the main lessons from the experience. In this way, comrades can move the level of political consciousness to a higher level. This is the 'mass line' method of political work.
DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM.
Democratic centralism is also a key feature of our vanguard movement. It is characterised by a high level of self discipline based on an understanding that the role is to advance the well being of Australian youth, and to recognise the importance of the collective, not to seek personal gains. This is fully in accord with our Australian Socialist tradition of co-operative organisation for the common good.
Decision-making is carried out through systems of democratic consultation and democratic voting. Once a decision has been made, there is an obligation on all members to carry it out. Dissenting minority views can be reserved and re-presented on a future occasion, but in the meantime, all members are expected to unite and work to implement democratically agreed decisions.
FORCES OF THE STATE.
Another key feature is the attitude to the forces of the state apparatus. While making use of the limited scope of 'legal democratic rights' to agitate, distribute material, conduct meetings and so on, a vanguard movement also takes into account the surveillance and disruption instigated by the paid agents of the state apparatus. It should never be forgotten that many millions of dollars are pumped into spreading rumours, intercepting mail, telephone, email communications, tracking comrades, friends and acquaintances, to say nothing of outright spying, infiltrating agents and poisoning relationships, as well as blatant bribery and intimidation. Rules for conduct with State Agencies are documented in Youth Series No. 2.
An Australianist vanguard movement guards its members, supporters and mass connections as much as possible. It does not conduct all its business in public scrutiny, understanding that the ruling traitor class is not overt to fascist style repression in defence of its wealth, power and domination of society.
White Nationalism and Women
Jane discusses the White patriotic movement from a woman's perspective. The days of being a boy's only club are over.
Stand out from the herd!
The people of Australia have been dumbed down so much by their diet of television, alcohol, greasy fast food and cheap rubbish made in China that they've become unable to think for themselves. They've become sheeple who believe everything that is dictated to them by the government/media and need new laws to protect them from themselves and the intruders that have flooded into the country over the last few decades.
Free thinkers and dissidents are automatically ostracised to stop the sheeple from ever waking up. On top of that the only platform that is not controlled by the government's masters will soon be censored so the only websites people will be able to view are sites suitable for a five-year-old. However, many free thinkers believe that it is too late for the sheeple as they've become too lazy and uninterested in issues of great importance. As long as they've still got beer in the fridge and rubbish on TV the status quo will continue unabated.
Finally we have our two-party preferred 'democracy' that is much like two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner. No matter who wins elections we are going to get screwed!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)